Tag Archive for ian chesterton

Gandalf and the Hero: Moffat vs. RTD

“It’s always [the companion’s] story. It was Rose Tyler’s story, it’s Amy Pond’s story – the story of the time they knew the Doctor and how that began, how it developed and how it ended,” Steven Moffat told BBC America, ”The story begins again, not so much with the new Doctor, but with the new companion. The Doctor’s the hero, but they’re the main character.”

I think this is a crucial difference between the Russell T Davies era and the Moffat era of Doctor Who (and indeed the difference between the William Hartnell era and the Jon Pertwee one).

Where RTD wrote the companion as the Doctor’s heroic equal (or at least someone who will acheive his equal by the end of the season), Moffat writes the Doctor as the hero of the story, and everyone else, including Amy, becomes a supporting character.

In RTD’s era, Rose, Martha, and Donna can be compared to the Doctor in their bravery and intelligence, and contribution to saving the universe. All three of those women saved the universe on an enormous, epic scale, in partnership with the Doctor, by the end of the season. I believe Davies wrote the companions with this intent. This is how you balance out the potential sexist element of the show.

See, the problem with Doctor Who, is that the main character is a dude, and his “assistant” is a woman. The marginalized group becomes a damsel in distress or just someone to “wow” at the Doctor’s intelligence. Davies countered this by making his three main companions’ journeys build up to moments of braveness where the Doctor became the “damsel” (surrounded by Daleks, captured by the Master, or locked up by Davros).  This served to remove gender from the “hero” role.

In Moffat’s Doctor Who, the Doctor is the sole hero, and everyone else plays second

Does Rory play second fiddle to Amy's second fiddle? Uh...third fiddle?

fiddle. EVERYONE. We’re not meant to view Amy as being on a potential even playing field to the Doctor the way Davies intended. Instead of an equivelent to the Doctor, Amy is meant to be seen beside Rory, River, and Craig.

There are problems with this format, however.  The male companions don’t get half the attention that the female companions receive.  River and Amy are far more important than Rory and Craig, who only get to star, arguably, in about three episodes combined.  Even after a whole season in the TARDIS, Rory only once got to outshine Amy (“The Girl Who Waited”).

On the whole, we think of the Doctor and Amy as the stars of this show, but Amy has yet to truly outshine the Doctor.  Yeah, she has a few minor wins early on (“The Beast Below”/”Victory of the Daleks”), but they’re weak, and minor, compared to the Doctor’s season finale blow-outs.  The problem is that the traditionally marginalized group (women) is always going to be the “assistant” in Moffat’s format.  The women are always going to be a little bit less wonderful than the staring male.

In “Meanwhile in the TARDIS”, the Doctor refers to himself as “Space Gandalf”.  Well, this is true, but more so back in the day.  In the original 60′s Doctor Who, the Doctor was truly Space Gandalf, serving as the magical genius vessel who moves the story and exposition.  But in Tolkien’s story, Bilbo is the hero.  Frodo is the hero.  Gandalf isn’t the hero.  Davies Doctor Who was also closer to this format.  The Doctor is a hero, he is magical and wonderful, but he’s really the vessel for the journey through which the companion becomes the hero.

But it seems Moffat is more interested in sticking to the Jon Pertwee/Tom Baker style Doctor Who, in which the Doctor is the hero, and although the companion is who we experience the story through, they will never acheive true heroism.

Ian and Barbara, the original Doctor Who companions

So what can be done about this?  How can we make the dynamic between hero and civilian less gendered in Moffat’s format?  Well, I think Moffat’s Who could seriously benefit from more attention to the male companion.  Its been done before, in the 60s Doctor Who; Ian and Barbara were very much equals as companions, and both had their chances to shine.  If Rory and Amy were on an even playing field, we might be able to see the Doctor as less gendered.

Alternatively, a female Doctor is going to make a world of difference.  The fact is, you can’t consistently cast the marginalized group as the “lesser” of the two leads without it coming across as a comment on gender.

Where Davies’ Who said, “the Doctor is a brilliant dude, but his female friends, with a bit of practice, can be just as brilliant.”  Moffat’s Who says, “the Doctor is a brilliant dude, and his girlfriends think he’s awesome for it.”  I wonder if this problem was born out of a misinterpretation of Davies’ Who on Moffat’s part?  Perhaps if Moffat had started Doctor Who back in 2005, we’d have had two companions from the get go, without the Davies’ imposed Doctor/companion format.  Either way, we need a change.  Let Gandalf be Gandalf.  Let the woman be the hero.

Domesticating the Doctor I: Cocoa, Test-tubes and the Classic Years

Domesticity and Doctor Who don’t seem to fit together, as concepts. There’s something about this show, and its fandom, and possibly the hero himself, that rails against the ordinary and the everyday.

You could argue (as I think I might, in future posts) that a major theme of New Who is the uncomfortable and at times antagonistic relationship that the Doctor has with domesticity – he rails against it, runs from it, fails to see it when it smacks him in the nose, and on several occasions, has to compete with it for the attention of his companions.

Feminism often struggles to deal with the same issue. There’s a long tradition in feminist history of dismissing or disassociating itself from anything that smacks of the domestic, and while that’s an understandable side effect of trying to increase the options of female (and indeed, male) roles, it’s important to accept that domesticity can be a perfectly valid life choice. Even for superheroes.

Choice is key, though. There’s a big difference between characters who choose to embrace domesticity and those who are pushed into it against their nature. It doesn’t seem likely that the Doctor would ever willingly choose a domestic path… or does it? Before discussing the uses of domesticity in New Who, I want to look at the (far fewer) instances in the Classic series where domesticity is remotely relevant to the Doctor’s aimless, epic lifestyle in the TARDIS.

As it happens, this is the theme of the very first episode, “An Unearthly Child.” The First Doctor has ceased his wanderings in time and space in order to give his granddaughter Susan a “normal” life in one place for a while, and it’s driving him nuts. Susan is enjoying school, but not very good at faking normality, and when her teachers investigate, the Doctor takes the first opportunity he can to cut them all loose from 1963 London, and hurl them into the unknown.

We never learn the truth of how and why the Doctor ended up being Susan’s carer, but it’s very clear that the parental role is not one he inhabits comfortably. The addition of Ian and Barbara to the crew, however, gives Susan a semblance of “normal” family life in amongst all their mad adventures, at the expense of Ian and Barbara themselves, who have been ripped from their own life.

The contrast between mad adventuring and domesticity is actually rife through the First Doctor’s era. For a start, we get to see where they all eat and sleep, something happily ignored for decades at a time in the show. The Doctor accidentally goes through a cocoa-related betrothal ceremony with Cameca in The Aztecs, and responds to this discovery with utter bemusement (but isn’t above using the relationship for his own benefit). He abandons Susan so she can make the most of a fledgling romance in a war-ravaged future Earth (REALLY not a good parent) and promptly takes on a replacement in Vicki, who serves as his surrogate granddaughter up until she also falls in love, and the Doctor cuts her adrift in a war-ravaged Troy. Are we sensing a pattern here? The Doctor is willing to emulate family life on his own terms, travelling around randomly in his intergalactic house, but never considers allowing Susan or Vicki to bring her new boyfriend/future husband into the TARDIS.

(Obviously production decisions have a lot to do with this choice, but I didn’t say this article was going to be fair!)

It’s not until the Third Doctor that we see something close to domestication imposed upon him. The Time Lords may have ensured he is stuck on earth in one time stream, but it’s the Brigadier who provides the Doctor with a job and a laboratory, making sure he stays in one place. And boy, doesn’t the Doctor settle in? Luckily there are plenty of alien invasions to keep him amused, but in between all the adventuring and military politics, his life is almost cozy, with female assistants to pass him his test tubes and tell him how brilliant he is. The TARDIS, meanwhile, acts as a glorified cupboard in the corner.

Don’t get me wrong – the Third Doctor is constantly railing and complaining about being stuck on Earth, and never entirely accepts his confinement. But it’s telling that even when the Time Lords free him from his exile, he doesn’t quit his job – in between travelling in time and space he keeps returning to the laboratory and his UNIT family, drinking Sgt Benton’s excellent cuppas, bickering with the Brig, and tinkering with his cars on the weekend. Likewise, Jo’s time as companion never involves cutting herself of from everyday life – she goes on dates, earns a pay check, goes home to change her boots, and still gets to flit off to alien planets during work hours. Liz never even got to leave Earth!

This Third incarnation of the Doctor, then, is fully house-trained. But as soon as he regenerates into his Fourth identity, he and the TARDIS are off again, without looking back. Whenever the Doctor returns to UNIT you can see that he doesn’t quite fit, and isn’t tempted to stay with them. He is a domestic tourist again, occasionally turning up in the suburbs or someone’s home, but only when there’s something nasty in the woodwork.

The Fifth Doctor Years transform the TARDIS into something more home-like than had been seen since the early 60′s, with his companions’ bedrooms as regular sets, but eventually they all leave him to go home, or to find a new one. The Seventh Doctor examines domesticity through something of a scientific lens as he sorts out Ace’s back story, but family and home life in that era of Classic Who are portrayed very much as sources of gothic and suburban horror rather than somewhere safe and warm.

In the New Adventures novels, there’s only one really clear instance I recall where the Doctor was completely immersed in domesticity – the novel Human Nature by Paul Cornell, which I’ll talk about when I get to the David Tennant years rather than deal with the same plot twice. It’s one I highly recommend, though, if only to compare to the TV version!

In the Big Finish audio adventures, which occupy a headcanonspace for me between the classic and new series, even though there is substantial overlap with New Who, there’s only one relationship that I felt really pulled the Doctor against his nature into something like a domestic sphere. This was the pairing of the Sixth Doctor and Dr Evelyn Smythe, who is also the first ‘old lady’ companion the Doctor has ever had, though she was only 55 (a spring chicken!) when she first ran away with him.

Evelyn is a fabulous character, and managed to soften the blunter edges of the Sixth Doctor, not complaining about his pompousness as Peri did, but actively training him out of such behaviour. In “Thicker Than Water,” when he takes Mel to meet Evelyn, it’s clear that he credits Evelyn with having substantially improved his manners and temperament in dealing with people.

That word ‘cozy’ comes up again – while there is no romantic spark at all between the Doctor and Evelyn, they settle easily into the dynamic of an old married couple, and their adventures are dotted with nice chats, cups of cocoa (of the non-marital variety), and gentle holidays in between the madness and the Daleks. Evelyn leaves for love, but that’s not the end of her adventures, nor the end of her relationship with the Doctor, who COMES BACK TO SEE HOW SHE’S DOING ON PURPOSE, something which I don’t think has happened in his history before. This relationship was very much a hint towards how the 21st Century Doctor (both in audio and on TV) was going to develop differently.

For the most part, the Doctors of the classic series and their associated (pre-2005) spin offs not only avoid domesticity, and long term family or relationship ties, but seem to look straightthrough them, ignoring their existence. No, not even ignoring their existence, because he’s so rarely put in a situation where they impinge upon his reality.

The endless traveller is constantly moving forward. He never stops to pick out furniture, or to drop in to any former companions’ homes for tea, biscuits and baby photos. Even his beloved TARDIS is constantly changing (or being changed) by him, often at times of emotional crisis – the jettisoning of Romana’s room, for example, or the restoration that happens just before The Five Doctors.

But something does change for him, and it’s possible that the turning point can be seen in the portrayal of the elderly Seventh Doctor at the beginning of the TV Movie, which also marks close to the halfway point of the Wilderness Years between Classic and New Who – instead of the stark white console room, we see flying buttresses and a sitting room that resembles a Victorian parlour – the Doctor sips his cup of tea and reads a book, surrounded by the music from his record player, a dish of jelly babies and a cluttered (one might almost say, cozy) assortment of possessions.

It’s a calm, utterly domestic scene between a Time Lord and his TARDIS. Who else, after all, was he ever going to settle down with?

The Eighth Doctor we see in the TV Movie was every bit the undomesticated adventurer of most of his predecessors, but for the first time in that story we see a companion’s home, and a friend for the Doctor who is willing to not only turn down his invitation to travel in the TARDIS, but to counter it with an invitation of her own: to stay with her, and fit into her life.

Of course he didn’t say yes – barely even took the question seriously. But the fact that it had been asked was a turning point for the series. Not since Cameca in The Aztecs and Susan before An Unearthly Child had someone suggested to the Doctor that he stop moving for personal reasons, and choose to settle down in one time and place.

When Doctor Who came back in 2005, that question was going to get larger, and louder, and domesticity would no longer be something the Doctor would have the luxury to ignore, as the show itself began to pay greater attention to the needs of the humans around him.

But this post is long enough already. Tune in soon for Part II of Domesticating the Doctor!